viggleby @mysticgiggle add to chipmunk.land.mysticgiggle.com
mysticgiggle add intel itanium emulation to scratch.mysticgiggle.com
mysticgigglе - go to this post
mysticgiggle add intel itanium emulation to scratch.mysticgiggle.com
Intel Itanium emulation is actually a field that, as far as I know, has faced lots of neglect unfortunately. I'm interested in working on it someday (not soon!) perhaps, however I'd like to note that Scratch is certainly not the medium that should be used. The Scratch VM is an absurdly inefficient target for a program, and writing emulators for it shoiuld be done for the sake of novelty, not in an attempt to revive a mostly abandoned ISA. A QEMU fork would make more sense.
max - go to this post
-snip- A QEMU fork would make more sense.
Not really, since it currently cannot emulate the Itanium at all. There exists an Itanium emulator, though it definitely isn't complete as it can only run a modified Linux kernel. But at least CPU emulation is mostly if not entirely there, so it would probably be easier to improve that instead of making a new emulator. In case you wanna check it out, it's called Ski, and it's a fork of an emulator of the same name written by Hewlett-Packard.
Edit: FYI I believe it emulates an Itanium 2, so even more work would be needed to run 64-bit Windows XP RTM.
Heathercat123 - go to this post
Not really, since it currently cannot emulate the Itanium at all. There exists an Itanium emulator, though it definitely isn't complete as it can only run a modified Linux kernel. But at least CPU emulation is mostly if not entirely there, so it would probably be easier to improve that instead of making a new emulator. In case you wanna check it out, it's called Ski, and it's a fork of an emulator of the same name written by Hewlett-Packard.
Edit: FYI I believe it emulates an Itanium 2, so even more work would be needed to run 64-bit Windows XP RTM.
Perhaps I didn't look into it enough, and it has been a while since I did. I also thought of QEMU since it's such a common emulator in general, but Ski does seem like a good target.
Heathercat123 - go to this post
Not really, since it currently cannot emulate the Itanium at all.
And that's exactly why it should get Itanium support! Adding support for it in QEMU would allow very easy integration in different VM managers (virt-manager, GNOME Boxes, …), along with lots of features not needing to be written from the ground up (things like ACPI and PCI, which are notoriously hard to get right - just ask Bill Gates why that is).
amy - go to this post
And that's exactly why it should get Itanium support! Adding support for it in QEMU would allow very easy integration in different VM managers (virt-manager, GNOME Boxes, …), along with lots of features not needing to be written from the ground up (things like ACPI and PCI, which are notoriously hard to get right - just ask Bill Gates why that is).
Linux living rent free in the heads of Microsoft executives since '99… my god…
Honestly I haven't really looked into the capabilities of Ski, nor how either emulator works, at the moment. I didn't even realize Ski was meant to emulate a whole kernel till now…
(sorry, I'm quite lazy as always, but hey at least I said it wouldn't be soon!)
It seems like someone in the BetaWiki Discord server managed to get EFI firmware running on Ski, though it can't boot anything yet. Itanium emulation should become its own thread (or "conversation") atp.
Edit: I don't think he shared it yet. though.
kys NOW
mysticgiggle - go to this post
kys NOW
No thanks, I'd rather stay alive.
mysticgiggle - go to this post
kys NOW
no u
mysticgigglе - go to this post
mysticgiggle add intel itanium emulation to scratch.mysticgiggle.com

max - go to this post
Intel Itanium emulation is actually a field that, as far as I know, has faced lots of neglect unfortunately. I'm interested in working on it someday (not soon!) perhaps, however I'd like to note that Scratch is certainly not the medium that should be used. The Scratch VM is an absurdly inefficient target for a program, and writing emulators for it shoiuld be done for the sake of novelty, not in an attempt to revive a mostly abandoned ISA. A QEMU fork would make more sense.
make mysticgiggle.com exist and make it a chipmunk.land alternative
Heathercat123 - go to this post
No thanks, I'd rather stay alive.
mysticgiggle's esobb account got hacked by parker2991
Powered by esoBB
522 posts - 57 conversations - 0 members online