<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>esoBB bug tracking - eso.chipmunk.land</title>
	<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/20/esobb-bug-tracking/" rel="alternate"/>
	<subtitle>bug, eso, esobb</subtitle>	<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/feed/conversation/20/</id>
	<updated>2026-06-24T21:14:31Z</updated>
	<generator>esoBB</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>opt</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/90/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/90/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T21:14:31Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>opt</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>max - <a href='https://eso.chipmunk.land/index.php/post/87/' class='postLink'></a></cite></p><p>Perhaps they&#39;re afraid that dox/raids could get them in trouble with their hosting provider(s) or other higher-ups, though I can&#39;t be sure.</p></blockquote><p>Maybe. Don&#39;t think the owner had a problem facilitating raids in the past, though.</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>max</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/87/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/87/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T21:12:14Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>max</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>opt - <a href='https://eso.chipmunk.land/index.php/post/84/' class='postLink'></a></cite></p><p>Unrelated to the topic, but I find <a href='https://github.com/geteso/esoBB/compare/master...esoteric#diff-6ec3884c2317910ee5fc8c991c4fcd24e6e6d8d8221a33c7e86e0a0feea4554aR34' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>this rule</a> added on the branch ironic. Almost seems like they&#39;re attempting to sanitize their image… I wonder why?</p></blockquote><p>Perhaps they&#39;re afraid that dox/raids could get them in trouble with their hosting provider(s) or other higher-ups, though I can&#39;t be sure.</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>opt</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/84/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/84/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T21:08:50Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>opt</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>max - <a href='https://eso.chipmunk.land/index.php/post/83/' class='postLink'></a></cite></p><p>The reasoning is actually quite simple. By cloning the master branch of esoBB, I inadvertently became an early adopter of esoBB 1.0.0e1. This version adds things such as the separated RSS plugin. I wouldn&#39;t say this is a bad thing, as it means I could catch a few bugs and potentially help make the release stable.<br/>It&#39;s also worth noting that <a href='https://esoteric.chat' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>esoteric.chat</a>, the most prominent production instance I know of, runs a <a href='https://github.com/geteso/esoBB/tree/esoteric' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>different branch</a> of esoBB too.</p></blockquote><p>Unrelated to the topic, but I find <a href='https://github.com/geteso/esoBB/compare/master...esoteric#diff-6ec3884c2317910ee5fc8c991c4fcd24e6e6d8d8221a33c7e86e0a0feea4554aR34' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>this rule</a> added on the branch ironic. Almost seems like they&#39;re attempting to sanitize their image… I wonder why?</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>max</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/83/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/83/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T17:05:27Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>max</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>opt - <a href='https://eso.chipmunk.land/index.php/post/81/' class='postLink'></a></cite></p><p>Block quoting seems to be a little bit broken - it appears that the end tag has to be on a newline, which isn&#39;t done for some reason when a post contains a list. Honestly, I&#39;m surprised there&#39;s elementary bugs like that still remaining, considering we&#39;re not the only people to have used esoBB… Maybe it&#39;s a regression introduced since we presumably run a newer version of PHP than esoBB targets?</p></blockquote><p>The reasoning is actually quite simple. By cloning the master branch of esoBB, I inadvertently became an early adopter of esoBB 1.0.0e1. This version adds things such as the separated RSS plugin. I wouldn&#39;t say this is a bad thing, as it means I could catch a few bugs and potentially help make the release stable.<br/>It&#39;s also worth noting that <a href='https://esoteric.chat' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>esoteric.chat</a>, the most prominent production instance I know of, runs a <a href='https://github.com/geteso/esoBB/tree/esoteric' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>different branch</a> of esoBB too.</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>opt</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/81/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/81/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T11:19:39Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>opt</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Block quoting seems to be a little bit broken - it appears that the end tag has to be on a newline, which isn&#39;t done for some reason when a post contains a list. Honestly, I&#39;m surprised there&#39;s elementary bugs like that still remaining, considering we&#39;re not the only people to have used esoBB… Maybe it&#39;s a regression introduced since we presumably run a newer version of PHP than esoBB targets?</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>max</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/78/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/78/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T04:21:39Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>max</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>On a side note, I wish I had actually bothered to learn SQL previously.</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>max</title>
		<link href="https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/77/" rel="alternate"/>
		<id>https://eso.chipmunk.land/post/77/</id>
		<updated>2026-06-24T04:20:30Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>max</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>esoBB is experimental software, and as would be expected has bugs. This is a thread for reporting and tracking such bugs, especially ones encountered &quot;in the wild&quot; / on this forum.<br/>Note that this forum runs a <a href='https://code.chipmunk.land/chipmunk.land/esoBB' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>fork</a> of esoBB, which means we can get quicker bugfixes. When patches are finished, I will try to contribute them <a href='https://github.com/geteso/esoBB' target='_blank' class='external' onclick='return Conversation.externalLink()'>upstream</a>.</p><p>Currently known bugs:</p><ul><li>Flood checker making invalid queries and causing error 500 -<b></b> partially fixed in the fork (by commenting out the faulty code); a real fix would require changing the database schema to account for IPv6</li><li>The email regex is too strict -<b></b> partially fixed in the fork; note that the current regex in the fork doesn&#39;t account for all possible emails (especially ones with quoted local-parts) and the old regex is still scattered across various files.</li><li>RSS feed returns error 500 -<b></b> fixed by renaming the plugin to avoid collision of class names, patch submitted upstream.</li><li>Many database values are unsigned 32-bit ints which could overflow -<b></b> more of a risk than a bug, perhaps it&#39;s not really significant; note that php only supports directly handling 64-bit integers on 64-bit processors as of now, AFAIK.</li><li>Closing a block quote ending with a list only works when the closing tag is on a new line (minor bug) -<b></b> unpatched</li></ul>]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>
